Peraturan Gereja: Kalau Beda Agama Boleh Aborsi

Hanya mengingatkan kalau anggur warnanya ungu. Kalau engga nganggur berarti engga ungu. Tuhan Yesus yang ngajarin.

Logikanya, kalau anggur ungu, Gereja Katolik dibangun di ladang gandum, eh kebun anggur. Jadi kalau beda agama engga boleh nganggur. Eh, maksudnya boleh digugurkan. Meski memang healing tidak sebentar.

Jadi kalau ungu apa? Anggur! Betul.

Kalau pink? Gandum.

Saya nilai Anda kesulitan membedakan anggur dan gandum. Saya juga binging bagaimana saya harus membantu Anda. Namun yang pasti, kalau beda agama hukumnya digugurkan, sehingga tidak mungkin anggur. Kita buktikan?

Apa kepanjangan PSK? Pekerja. Nah, jika Anda punya saudara menikah beda agama dan terlihat menganggur, jangan mudah cemburu. Karena dia "Bekerja". Apalagi menurut Hukum Gereja, pernikahannya unlawful marriage (UM). Bisa dibayangkan menurut Hukum Gereja bagaimana dia "Bekerja?" Saya tidak menakut-nakuti, hanya untuk supaya Anda bisa memutuskan untuk masa depan.

Anda merasa menganggur? Ingat-ingat saja kepanjangan PSK. Jika Anda "bekerja" di ranah ini, berarti Anda tidak sedang menganggur.

Idealnya, sebagai perempuan Anda memiliki penghasilan mandiri. Dan mengantongi sertifikat feminisme.

Ingat, boleh digugurkan kalau beda agama lho. Kalau agamanya sama dan digugurkan, disebut apa?

Nah, sebuah sumber fiktif menyebutkan sepasang suami istri menggugurkan. Loh, menikah kok menggugurkan? Saya belum sampai sana ilmunya. Mungkin engga punya uang. Mau anaknya KB aja.

Tapi kalau dipikir-pikir mereka beda agama. Ya wis, ra sah dipikir. Intinya kalau beda agama harusnya engga dipikir, karena engga ada kaitannya. Tapi ya iman orang beda-beda. Saya agak kekincian biar dibilang kekincian. 😚

3. In this spirit, Pope Leo XIII published his Encyclical Rerum Novarum in 1891, the 135 ^th anniversary of which we celebrate with deep gratitude this year. With that document, my beloved predecessor gave impetus to the reflection on society, the economy and politics, which is now known as the “Social Doctrine of the Church.” When some objected that the Church should not waste energy on worldly matters, but instead focus on communicating the message of eternal life, Leo XIII responded with realism and wisdom, saying that the proclamation of the Gospel cannot overlook the concrete lives of people. [4] Many decades have passed since then, and the Magisterium, pastors, theologians and faithful have continued to reflect on social issues in the light of the Gospel. Today, the Social Doctrine of the Church is a legacy of wisdom, where we find principles for thought, criteria for discernment and judgment, and concrete guidelines for action. Founded on Sacred Scripture and Tradition, and in engagement with the sciences, it helps us clearly interpret the challenges of the present and identify appropriate ways for living out a clear Christian witness, with joy and in service to the world. It is not an inert set of concepts, but a living corpus of truth that safeguards and interprets humanity’s vocation to a full and just life. I therefore wish to add my own voice to this living tradition, invoking the help of the Spirit of wisdom, who has dwelt in the world since its beginning (cf. Prov 8:22-31).

The res novae of our time

4. While Leo XIII spoke in his time of “new things” ( rerum novarum), today we cannot limit ourselves simply to repeating his insightful teachings. Instead, we must ask God for the wisdom to interpret the great trends of our time, particularly technological advances. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident how rapidly and profoundly digitalization, artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are transforming our world. Technology should not be considered, in itself, as a force antagonistic to humanity. On the contrary, it has formed part of our history since the beginning as “a profoundly human reality, linked to the autonomy and freedom of man.” [5] Over the centuries, technological development has significantly improved the living conditions of humanity. At the same time, each phase of progress has also revealed the ambiguity of tools that can cause harm when not oriented toward the good. Today, however, we find ourselves facing a new situation. The power and prevalence of emerging technologies are interwoven into the fabric of daily life, shaping decision-making processes and deeply affecting the collective imagination: “Never has humanity had such power over itself.” [6] New technologies open up a horizon extending in directions that are imaginable but not yet fully predictable. This complicates the assessment of their potential impact and the long-term effects they may have on both the dignity of individuals and the common good.